25th June 2005
Poorest people suffered the most from the tsunami
Poor people suffered the most as a result of the tsunami and need to be
supported further during the reconstruction phase, a new report released
by international agency Oxfam.
The report, Targeting Poor People, that comes on the eve of the tsunami's
six-month anniversary shows that its impact on poor people has been
compounded by three factors:
- Poor communities were more vulnerable: their fragile houses were
washed away while the brick houses of richer people were more likely to
withstand the force; poor villages in remote areas took longer to receive
help and had no doctors in the vicinity.
- A geographical coincidence meant that the tsunami affected some of
the poorest people in each of the three worst hit countries.
- Though the reconstruction effort in many cases is effectively helping
poor people, in some cases there has been a tendency to focus on landowners
business people and the most high profile cases, rather than prioritize aid
to poor communities.
Dr. Brian Scott, Director of Oxfam Ireland said:
"The tsunami has hit poor people hardest and has left them with the biggest
problems. However the generous response of the public has put us in a
strong position to address these problems. We must use this as an
opportunity to help people work their way out of poverty and to ensure they
are better placed to deal with natural disasters if and when they strike
again."
Oxfam and partners are working to help over one million people affected by
the tsunami in India, Sri Lanka and Indonesia. The overall immediate
relief effort has been a great success, stopping the outbreak of disease
and providing people with basics such as shelter and water. Oxfam is now
increasing its focus on women and marginalized groups to ensure no one is
left out of the aid effort and will spend $250 million over the next five
years.
For example, in India Oxfam is helping to rebuild salt-pans that provide
work for thousands of poor labourers, some of whom are from Dalit
communities. Those working on the salt-pans are extremely poor and
marginalized. But because their houses were not destroyed their needs were
not given official priority.
New survey data shows that in one village in Sri Lanka, villagers who lost
their homes suffered an average 94% drop in income from 64 cents (US) per
head of household per day to 4 cents per day. Part of this is due to the
inaccessibility of poor people who are often isolated and harder to
identify and reach through existing structures in society.
In Sri Lanka a lot of government aid has so far been targeted at registered
businesses. This means that, for example, the owners of coir (coconut
fibre) mills are being compensated for damage but the poor coir workers who
struggle to make a living will not benefit. In India there has been a
tendency to concentrate help on sea fishermen but other workers, such as
labourers, small farmers and salt-pan workers (many of whom are women or
from lower castes) have received less help.
The provision of housing for poor people also presents difficulties. Before
the tsunami, many of the most marginalised people were not landowners. Even
those who had land now often find themselves unable to prove it as they
have lost the official documents or because land rights formerly rested
with men (where women are now the heads of households).
Without a land title, these families risk being dispossessed of their land,
marginalizing them even further. In Indonesia the tsunami displaced up to
500,000 people. Better-off families, who may have had savings or wealthier
relatives who were able to help have already been able to leave the camps,
but thousands of poor people remain.
"Desperately poor people have been made poorer still by the tsunami. The
aid effort must now increase its emphasis on targeting poor people,
marginalized groups and women to ensure they are not excluded from the
reconstruction efforts," added Scott.
Oxfam recommends that governments and international agencies proactively
seek to address the particular needs of the poorest people affected by the
Tsunami. This is vital if these countries are to work towards achieving the
internationally agreed Millennium Development Goals of halving global
poverty by 2015.
Even before the tsunami the region was poor:
- In Aceh years of armed conflict had already reduced prosperity. In
2002 half of the population had no access to clean water and nearly a third
lived in poverty.
- In India, the southern coastal states worst hit, Kerala and Tamil
Nadu, were relatively wealthy but the people of the coastal communities are
some of the poorest in the whole country. In each of the three most
affected districts (Nagapattinam, Cuddalore, and Kannaykumari) the average
person lives on less than $1 per day.
- In Sri Lanka up to one-third of the population in the areas affected
by the tsunami live below the poverty line, with the situation particularly
bad in the conflict hit North and East.
For interviews, video news release material, a copy of the report and pictures call:
Paul Dunphy - General
Landline: + 01 6040706
Mobile: + 0879058075 |
Kim Tan - In Aceh
Mobile: +62 815 305 9178
UK Mob: +44 7786 660407 |
Carmen Rodriguez
Indian Mobile: +91 98 405 597 61
Spanish Mob: +34 615 359 401 |
Anna Mitchell - In Sri Lanka
Mobile: +94 77 321 5571
UK Mob: +44 7900 160 580 |
|